<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; ruffling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/ruffling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pharma FDI: Damning Report of Parliamentary Panel, PM Vetoes&#8230;and Avoids Ruffling Feathers?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-damning-report-of-parliamentary-panel-pm-vetoes-and-avoids-ruffling-feathers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pharma-fdi-damning-report-of-parliamentary-panel-pm-vetoes-and-avoids-ruffling-feathers</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-damning-report-of-parliamentary-panel-pm-vetoes-and-avoids-ruffling-feathers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daiichi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illusionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oligopolistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piramal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranbaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restriction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrograde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruffling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sankyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USFDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vetoed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vetoes veto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=3241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting situation emerged last week. The Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Commerce proposed a blanket ban on all FDI in brownfield pharma sector. Just two days after that, the Prime Minister of India vetoed the joint opposition of the Department &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-damning-report-of-parliamentary-panel-pm-vetoes-and-avoids-ruffling-feathers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-damning-report-of-parliamentary-panel-pm-vetoes-and-avoids-ruffling-feathers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pioglitazone Conundrum: Should The Drug Regulator Step Over The Line?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/pioglitazone-conundrum-should-the-drug-regulator-step-over-the-line/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pioglitazone-conundrum-should-the-drug-regulator-step-over-the-line</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/pioglitazone-conundrum-should-the-drug-regulator-step-over-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bladder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conundrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indudtry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intriguing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JAPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacovigilance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pioglitazone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruffling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 26A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USFDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdrawal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent order of the Indian drug regulator to withdraw all formulations of the well known, yet controversial, anti-diabetic drug &#8211; Pioglitazone from the domestic market has created a flutter in the country, ruffling many feathers at the same time. Withdrawal &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/pioglitazone-conundrum-should-the-drug-regulator-step-over-the-line/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/pioglitazone-conundrum-should-the-drug-regulator-step-over-the-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
