<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; revocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/revocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MNCs to Challenge MNC Patents in India: Boon for Patients?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/mncs-to-challenge-mnc-patents-in-india-boon-for-patients/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mncs-to-challenge-mnc-patents-in-india-boon-for-patients</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/mncs-to-challenge-mnc-patents-in-india-boon-for-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biocon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herceptin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lantus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[License]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mylan. Frsenius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests. patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanofi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thiland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=3650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Close on the heels of a reasonably successful patent challenge by the German pharma Multinational Corporation (MNC) Fresenius Kabi for the breast cancer drug Tykerb of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in India, another MNC Mylan, with its headquarter in the United states, &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/mncs-to-challenge-mnc-patents-in-india-boon-for-patients/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/mncs-to-challenge-mnc-patents-in-india-boon-for-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Landmark Glivec Judgment Discourage Innovation in India?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[191]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AstraZeneca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gefitinib. Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glivec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highcourt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janumet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Januvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicines. imatinib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesylate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pegasys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socioeconomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stutent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wockhardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zita-Met]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I do not think so. The 112 pages well articulated judgment of the Supreme Court of India delivered on April 1, 2013, does not even remotely discourage innovation in India, including much talked about ‘incremental innovation’. This landmark judgment &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revocation and Denial of Patents on Patentability Ground in India: The Fallout and the Road Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/revocation-and-denial-of-patents-on-patentability-ground-in-india-the-fallout-and-the-road-ahead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=revocation-and-denial-of-patents-on-patentability-ground-in-india-the-fallout-and-the-road-ahead</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/revocation-and-denial-of-patents-on-patentability-ground-in-india-the-fallout-and-the-road-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kopran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutraceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapanray.in/index.php/?p=1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 26, 2012, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) reportedly denied patent protection for AstraZeneca’s anti-cancer drug Gefitinib on the ground that the molecule lacked invention. The report also states that AstraZeneca suffered its first setback on Gefitinib in June 2006, &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/revocation-and-denial-of-patents-on-patentability-ground-in-india-the-fallout-and-the-road-ahead/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/revocation-and-denial-of-patents-on-patentability-ground-in-india-the-fallout-and-the-road-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
