<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; Opinionated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/opinionated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pharma FDI Debate: Highly Opinionated, Sans Assessment of Tangible Outcomes?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-debate-highly-opinionated-sans-assessment-of-tangible-outcomes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pharma-fdi-debate-highly-opinionated-sans-assessment-of-tangible-outcomes</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-debate-highly-opinionated-sans-assessment-of-tangible-outcomes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ilk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinionated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tangible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=4217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2001, the Government of India (GoI) allowed 100 percent Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) in the pharmaceutical sector through automatic route to attract more investments for new asset creation, boost R&#38;D, new job creation and ultimately to help aligning Indian &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-debate-highly-opinionated-sans-assessment-of-tangible-outcomes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/pharma-fdi-debate-highly-opinionated-sans-assessment-of-tangible-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
