<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Indian Patents Act conform to Article 27 (Patentable Subject Matter) of TRIPS on the issue of ‘local working of patents’?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-indian-patents-act-conform-to-article-27-patentable-subject-matter-of-trips-on-the-issue-of-local-working-of-patents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=does-the-indian-patents-act-conform-to-article-27-patentable-subject-matter-of-trips-on-the-issue-of-local-working-of-patents</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-indian-patents-act-conform-to-article-27-patentable-subject-matter-of-trips-on-the-issue-of-local-working-of-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Does]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patentable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapanray.in/index.php/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[India is one of the signatories of TRIPS and has a national commitment on adherence to this important international agreement. It is, therefore, widely believed that the amended Indian Patents Act will be TRIPS compliant. A recent circular from CGPTD: &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-indian-patents-act-conform-to-article-27-patentable-subject-matter-of-trips-on-the-issue-of-local-working-of-patents/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-indian-patents-act-conform-to-article-27-patentable-subject-matter-of-trips-on-the-issue-of-local-working-of-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
