<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Landmark Glivec Judgment Discourage Innovation in India?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[191]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AstraZeneca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gefitinib. Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glivec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highcourt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janumet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Januvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicines. imatinib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesylate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pegasys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socioeconomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stutent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wockhardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zita-Met]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I do not think so. The 112 pages well articulated judgment of the Supreme Court of India delivered on April 1, 2013, does not even remotely discourage innovation in India, including much talked about ‘incremental innovation’. This landmark judgment &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/does-the-landmark-glivec-judgment-discourage-innovation-in-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
