<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; Enticing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/enticing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Conundrum: Ignoring India Will Just Not be Foolhardy, Not An Option Either</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/patent-conundrum-ignoring-india-will-just-not-be-foolhardy-not-an-option-either/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=patent-conundrum-ignoring-india-will-just-not-be-foolhardy-not-an-option-either</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/patent-conundrum-ignoring-india-will-just-not-be-foolhardy-not-an-option-either/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conundrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enticing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foolhardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glivec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexavar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pascal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PwC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=2267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent verdict of the Supreme Court against Novartis, upholding the decision of the Indian Patent Office (IPO) against grant of patent to their cancer drug Glivec, based on Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act, has caused a flutter &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/patent-conundrum-ignoring-india-will-just-not-be-foolhardy-not-an-option-either/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/patent-conundrum-ignoring-india-will-just-not-be-foolhardy-not-an-option-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India: Too Enticing a Pharma Market to Ignore by the Global Players despite unhappiness</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/india-too-enticing-a-pharma-market-to-ignore-by-the-global-players-despite-unhappiness/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=india-too-enticing-a-pharma-market-to-ignore-by-the-global-players-despite-unhappiness</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/india-too-enticing-a-pharma-market-to-ignore-by-the-global-players-despite-unhappiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[despite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enticing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kopran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutraceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unhappiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapanray.in/index.php/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A White-Paper, titled “Emerging Markets Today and Tomorrow: Insights on Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Future Trends in the BRIC Landscape”, released by a global technology and services company specializing in healthcare, Cegedim, in June, 2012 highlighted that 20 to 30 percent &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/india-too-enticing-a-pharma-market-to-ignore-by-the-global-players-despite-unhappiness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/india-too-enticing-a-pharma-market-to-ignore-by-the-global-players-despite-unhappiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
