<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PILMAN &#187; Clift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapanray.in/tag/clift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapanray.in</link>
	<description>A Tapan Ray Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>‘Data Protection’: Needs A Clear Direction…But Is It An IPR Issue?</title>
		<link>http://www.tapanray.in/data-protection-needs-a-clear-directionbut-is-it-an-ipr-issue/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=data-protection-needs-a-clear-directionbut-is-it-an-ipr-issue</link>
		<comments>http://www.tapanray.in/data-protection-needs-a-clear-directionbut-is-it-an-ipr-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tapan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satwant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapanray.in/?p=6397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The terminologies ‘Data Exclusivity’ and ‘Data Protection’ are quite often used interchangeably by many, creating a great deal of confusion on the subject. However, in a true sense these are quite different issues having critical impact on public health interest &#8230; <a href="http://www.tapanray.in/data-protection-needs-a-clear-directionbut-is-it-an-ipr-issue/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tapanray.in/data-protection-needs-a-clear-directionbut-is-it-an-ipr-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
